Oregon Supreme court affirm that it’s not crime to look at child pornography while surfing the net as long as the images have no any intention to harm others.
Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court Michael Gillette presented his view when the law saying that watching child pornography on the Internet is ok.
Everyone has common thinking, every porn star works at his own desire, but has anyone tried to think why each one thinks that way?
There is a race going on in every state to be the first to make a new law, but no one thinks of the outcome of it.
Pictures kept in museums, we all know have great artistic skills and great ability to attract anyone. The way it’s been drawn, and how it is presented directly affects a person’s mind. Are we so dumb that we think the porn pictures or videos kept on the Internet wont affect anyone. It might not affect negatively, but it won’t give any positive remarks either.
There is no need to download videos and pictures because many people will gather around in one home and watch them without downloading, so it is just rubbish to say that no one can download it.
Nevertheless, in today’s world of economic crisis who would download any video, or pictures it is just worthless to say that it is crime to download the porn pictures.
Why do many porn directors make movies? Isn’t the idea so clear to all that it means only to earn money? The Supreme Court of Oregon provided an easy way to expand the business of pornography simply by securing the law to watch it.
The law that has been passed in Oregon is directly proportional to the increase in child sexual abuse. The increase in number of watching porn videos means more demand of it, to fulfill it there would be more production and more of it means more children are either forcefully or by( showing some greed) coming out in new videos or pictures.
instead of creating some strict law on child pornography or any such things related to it,
Why are the courts of Oregon making such decision to just watch it.
Instead of finding the main root for all this child pornography, the courts should find and punish the people involved in this dilemma.
Our government is wasting its time in making that law such a brainless activity.
Why don’t they take child pornography as serious case? Didn’t they forget that it might be the pictures that are illegal to watch and it might have been made by torturing the child like an animal. Didn’t they think that the law in such a way in that if anyone trying to make child porn should be given the death penalty?
